Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Chinese Journal of cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine ; (6): 692-696, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-733607

ABSTRACT

Objective:To study influence of nifedipine combined metoprolol sustained release tablets on blood pressure and heart rate in hypertensive patients with coronary heart disease (CHD).Methods:A total of 120 hypertensive patients with CHD were selected,randomly and equally divided into nifedipine group (n=60,received nifedipine monotherapy) and combined treatment group (n=60,received nifedipine combined metoprolol ),both groups were treated for 12 weeks.Blood pressure,heart rate and indexes of heart rate variability (HRV) were measured and compared between two groups.Results:Compared with before treatment,after treatment,there were significant reductions in 24h mean heart rate (24h HR AV) and mean arterial pressure (MAP),P=0.001 both,and significant rise in standard deviation of normal to normal RR intervals calculated over the 24h period (SDNN),standard devia-tion of normal to normal RR intervals in all 5min segments of the entire recording (SDANN),root-mean square of differences between successive normal to normal intervals (rMSSD) and adjacent normal RR interval difference >50ms stroke accounted for a percentage of 24h total RR interval (PNN50) in two groups,P< 0.05 or < 0.01.Compared with nifedipine group after treatment,there were significant reductions in 24hmHR [ (69.24 ± 10.67) beats/min vs.(64.08 ± 8.94) beats/min] and MAP [ (98.06 ± 5.18) mmHg vs.(92.64 ± 4.43) mmHg,P<0.01 all],and significant rise in SDNN [ (113.89 ± 20.93) ms vs.(124.57 ± 25.34) ms,P<0.05],SDANN [ (108.31 ± 20.26) ms vs.(119.29 ± 19.37) ms,P=0.001],rMSSD [ (29.67 ± 11.92) ms vs.(36.23 ± 12.34) ms,P=0.001] and PNN50 [ (11.25 ± 4.03)% vs.(15.37 ± 4.82)%,P=0.001] in combined treatment group.There was no significant difference in total effective rate between two groups,P= 0.272.Conclusion:Nifedipine combined Metoprolol sustained release tablets possesses significant therapeutic effect on hypertensive patients with CHD.It can effectively control heart rate and blood pressure,and contribute to improving HRV and prognosis,which is worth extending.

2.
Chinese Journal of cardiovascular Rehabilitation Medicine ; (6): 687-691, 2018.
Article in Chinese | WPRIM | ID: wpr-733606

ABSTRACT

Objective:To study influence of amlodipine combined enalapril antihypertensive therapy on renal function in aged patients with essential hypertension (EH) complicated coronary heart disease (CHD).Methods:A total of 120 aged EH + CHD patients in our hospital from Feb 2014 to Apr 2016 were enrolled.Patients were randomly and equally divided into amlodipine group,enalapril group and combined treatment group (received amlodipine com-bined enalapril treatment ),all groups were treated for 12 weeks.Total effective rate,standard-reaching condition of blood pressure,urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER),levels of serum creatinine (Scr),cystatin C (CysC) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) before and after treatment,and incidence of adverse reactions were measured and com-pared among three groups.Results:There was no significant difference in total effective rate among three groups,P=0.139.Compared with amlodipine group and enalapril group,there was significant reduction in standard-reaching time of blood pressure [ (10.84 ± 2.79) months vs.(10.75 ± 3.31) months vs.(8.20 ± 1.46) months] in com-bined treatment group,P=0.001 all.Compared with before treatment,after 12-week treatment,there were sig-nificant reductions in UAER,levels of Scr,serum CysC and BUN in amlodipine group and combined treatment group,P<0.05 or < 0.01;compared with amlodipine group and enalapril group after 12-week treatment,there were significant reductions in UAER [(130.55 ± 12.72) μg/min vs.(135.63 ± 17.64) μg/min vs.(112.25 ± 13.34) μg/min],levels of Scr [ (79.32 ± 6.13) μmol/L vs.(80.25 ± 5.97) μmol/L vs.(68.04 ± 5.56) μmol/L],serum CysC [ (1.14 ± 0.23) mg/L vs.(1.21 ± 0.26) mg/L vs.(0.76 ± 0.17) mg/L] and BUN [ (5.16 ± 1.13) mmol/L vs.(5.79 ± 1.03) mmol/L vs.(4.23 ± 0.56) mmol/L] in combined treatment group,and BUN level of amlodip-ine group was significantly lower than that of enalapril group,P<0.05 or <0.01.There was no significant differ-ence in incidence rate of adverse reactions during treatment among three groups,P=0.757.Conclusion:Small dose amlodipine combined enalapril is effective on controlling blood pressure in aged EH + CHD patients.Compared with monotherapy,it possesses better protection on renal function with high safety,which is worth extending.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL